You are here

Policy scores for transparency

Producer countries
Transparency
Existence (0-2) Design (0-5) Implementation (0-5)
Brazil Cameroon Ghana Indonesia Malaysia Brazil Cameroon Ghana Indonesia Malaysia Brazil Cameroon Ghana Indonesia Malaysia
Institutional ‐ public document describing roles, responsilbility and controls 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 3 2 n/a 2 2 2 1 n/a
Resource allocation Rules for resource allocation processes 2 2 2 1 0           4 4 5 1 n/a
Dates for allocation processes to be held 2 2 2 0 1 5 5 5 n/a 3 5 5 5 n/a 3
Results of resource allocation processes 2 2 2 0 0 5 5 1 1 n/a 5 5 3 1 n/a
Summary data on harvest, processing and international trade 2 0 0 0 0 5 n/a n/a 1 n/a 5 3 n/a 3 5
Resource use Location of concessions, ownership and contacts 2 2 2 0 1 5 3 3 1 3 5 3 3 1 2
Concession licences, inventories and harvest plans 2 0 0 0 0 5 n/a 1 n/a 0 5 3 3 1 1
Environmental & social impact assessments 2 2 2 2 0 5 5 3 5 1 5 5 3 3 3
Enforcement Data on forest crimes 0 0 0 0 0 1 n/a n/a 1 1 1 3 3 1 3
Disposals of confiscated wood 0 0 0 0 0 1 n/a n/a 1 1 1 3 3 1 3

Notes: 1. Highlighted scores are particularly uncertain and may be inappropriate.
2. Scores have been assessed against fuller and more detailed versions of the policy questions than the short-form versions presented in the table above.
Full versions are included in Appendix B.
3. Existence and design scores relate to whether written regulations or policies require the relevant information to be transparent; implementation scores indicate whether it actually is transparent. In some instances information is available even where this is not required – in such cases a score is given for implementation even where the score for existence may be zero.