You are here
Policy scores for legislation and regulations on illegally sourced timber
Legislation and regulations on illegally sourced timber
|Existence (0-2)||Design (0-5)||Implementation (0-5)|
|Analysis of existing legislation and regulations||0||0||2||2||2||n/a||n/a||4||5||2|
|Enactment of additional legislation||1||0||1||1||2||2||n/a||2||2||4||n/a||n/a||n/a||n/a||n/a|
Notes: 1. Scores have been assessed against fuller and more detailed versions of the policy questions than the short-form versions presented in the table
above. Full versions are included in Appendix B.
2. France, the Netherlands and the UK are given a partial score for existence of additional legislation, based on the EU due diligence regulation currently in the process of being enacted. Scores for design of this regulation are based on the current European Commission draft.
3. The study considered that the US Lacey Act amendment was enacted too recently for a score for implementation to be assessed.