You are here
Policy scores for institutional and operational factors in law enforcement
Institutional & operational factors in law enforcement
|Existence (0-2)||Design (0-5)||Implementation (0-5)|
|Penalties proportionate and dissuasive||4||3||4||4||4||2||2||1||2||2|
|Coordination systems in place for different agencies involved in enforcement||2||1||0||1||2||4||2||n/a||1||4||4||1||n/a||n/a||3|
|Forest officials/law enforcement staff sufficiently resourced||2||2||1||2||2||2||2||2||1||1|
|Training non-forest||Training judges and prosecutors||2||2||2||2||0|
|Training customs officials||2||2||0||2||3|
|Information gathering tools||Remote sensing systems||5||3||0||1||3|
|In-the-field investigatory tools (e.g. NGOs, informants)||4||1||1||3||3|
|Material flow analyses (analysing discrepancies)||2||2||2||0||0|
|Log-tracking and checkpoint systems (data analysis)||2||2||2||2||4|
Notes: 1. Highlighted scores are particularly uncertain and may be inappropriate.
2. Scores have been assessed against fuller and more detailed versions of the policy questions than the short-form versions presented in the table above.
Full versions are included in Appendix B.