You are here

Policy scores for institutional and operational factors in law enforcement

Producer countries
Institutional & operational factors in law enforcement
Existence (0-2) Design (0-5) Implementation (0-5)
Brazil Cameroon Ghana Indonesia Malaysia Brazil Cameroon Ghana Indonesia Malaysia Brazil Cameroon Ghana Indonesia Malaysia
Penalties proportionate and dissuasive           4 3 4 4 4 2 2 1 2 2
Coordination systems in place for different agencies involved in enforcement 2 1 0 1 2 4 2 n/a 1 4 4 1 n/a n/a 3
Forest officials/law enforcement staff sufficiently resourced           2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1
Training non-forest Training judges and prosecutors                     2 2 2 2 0
Training customs officials                     2 2 0 2 3
Information gathering tools Remote sensing systems                     5 3 0 1 3
In-the-field investigatory tools (e.g. NGOs, informants)                     4 1 1 3 3
Material flow analyses (analysing discrepancies)                     2 2 2 0 0
Log-tracking and checkpoint systems (data analysis)                     2 2 2 2 4

Notes: 1. Highlighted scores are particularly uncertain and may be inappropriate.
2. Scores have been assessed against fuller and more detailed versions of the policy questions than the short-form versions presented in the table above.
Full versions are included in Appendix B.